Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882719›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Exploring nursing home resident and their care partner priorities for care using the Action-Project Method.

Andrea Gruneir, Matthias Hoben, Adam Easterbrook, Charlotte Jensen, Monica Buencamino, Jaclyn Tompalski, Stephanie A Chamberlain, Sadaf Ekhlas, Gillian Bever, Ruth Murphy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrea GruneirDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada. gruneir@ualberta.ca.
Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Adam EasterbrookCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, 588-1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z IY6, Canada.
Charlotte JensenDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada.
Monica BuencaminoFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Jaclyn TompalskiDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Carleton University, B750 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Stephanie A ChamberlainDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada.
Sadaf EkhlasCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Gillian BeverDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, T325-2211, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Ruth MurphyTranslating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Research Program, Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Carole A EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Janice KeefeDepartment of Family Studies and Gerontology and Nova Scotia Centre On Aging, Mount Saint Vincent University, 166 Bedford Highway, Halifax, NS, B3M 2J6, Canada.
Sheila MarshallSchool of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Jack Bell Building, 2080 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 145401CIHR 156426CIHR 162236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing home (NH) residents' experiences are embedded within their relationships to others. Our objectives were to describe how residents and care partners (family or staff members) jointly construct, discuss, and act on care priorities.

methodsWe used Action-Project Method, a qualitative method focused on action within social context. We recruited 15 residents and 12 care partners (5 family and 7 staff members) from 3 urban NHs in Alberta, Canada. Residents and care partners participated in a video-recorded conversation about their experiences in the NH, then individually reviewed the video-recording to add context to the conversation. Following transcription, preliminary narrative construction, and participant feedback, the research team conducted in-depth analysis to identify participant actions, goals, and projects, including those jointly shared by dyad members.

resultsAll participants' intentions could be broadly described as "making time in the NH as good as possible" and projects were grouped into five categories: resident identity, relationships (both presence and absence), advocacy, positivity, and respectful care. Participants often raised issues of short-staffing as a significant barrier to respectful care. Care partners, especially staff, used positivity to redirect residents from difficult topics. Joint projects could be identified in some, but not all, cases.

conclusionsWe found that maintaining a sense of identity, fostering relationships, and receiving respectful care were important to residents but that short-staffing created barriers. Methods to capture these aspects of the resident experience are needed but should not be influenced by care partners' tendency towards positivity in resident interactions.

Indexed as

CaregiversSocial EnvironmentAlbertaHumansNursing HomesWorkforceCare partnerCare relationshipsQuality measurementResident experience

Identifiers

PMID36882719
PMCPMC9993719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.