Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882717›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2023

Probable enterotoxin-associated toxic shock syndrome caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis.

William F Pomputius, Samuel H Kilgore, Patrick M Schlievert

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Toxic Shock Syndrome: A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William F PomputiusDivision of Infectious Disease, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Samuel H KilgoreDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Patrick M SchlievertDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA. patrick-schlievert@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8314-9369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe a case of a toxic shock-like syndrome in a child, which was associated with Staphylococcus epidermidis instead of Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pyogenes, the usual causes of toxic shock syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was an 8-year-old boy who developed a toxic shock syndrome-like illness, including fever, hypotension, and rash. The Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate was cultured from urine, but this organism was unavailable for toxin testing. Multiple blood cultures were negative. Instead, a highly novel assay was used on acute plasma from the patient which demonstrated the presence of the genes for superantigens, staphylococcal enterotoxins A, C, D, and E. Superantigens are the known causes of toxic shock syndrome.

conclusionsOur study suggests strongly that Staphylococcus epidermidis was causing the TSS symptoms through the known Staphylococcus aureus superantigens. It is unknown how many other such patients exist; this should be explored. Of great importance is that PCR performed directly on blood plasma in the absence of microbial isolation could be used to demonstrate superantigen genes.

Indexed as

ExanthemaShock, SepticStaphylococcal InfectionsChildEnterotoxinsHumansMaleStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisSuperantigensEnterotoxinsSuperantigensCase reportEnterotoxinStaphylococcus epidermidisToxic shock syndromeUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID36882717
PMCPMC9989563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.