ArticleBMC microbiology2023
Rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples of suspected patients using a novel one-step loop-mediated isothermal amplification (one-step LAMP) technique.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- RUNCOV: a one-pot triplex real-time RT-LAMP as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Evaluation and comparison of one-step real-time PCR and one-step RT-LAMP methods for detection of SARS-CoV-2.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the absence of effective antiviral drugs or vaccines, early and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study developed and evaluated a novel rapid One-Step LAMP assay to directly detect the SARS-CoV-2 RNA from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples of patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection living in deprived areas in comparison to One-Step Real-time PCR.
methodsTwo hundred fifty-four NP swab samples from patients suspected of COVID-19 infection living in deprived western areas of Iran were tested by TaqMan One-Step RT-qPCR and fast One-Step LAMP assays. Tenfold serial dilutions of SARS-CoV-2 RNA standard strain where the viral copy number in each dilution was previously determined using the qPCR and various templates were used to investigate the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the One-Step LAMP assay in triplicate. Also, the efficacy and reliability of the method compared to TaqMan One-Step RT-qPCR were evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative clinical samples.
resultsThe results of the One-Step RT-qPCR and One-Step LAMP tests were positive in 131 (51.6%) and 127 (50%) participants, respectively. Based on Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), the agreement between the two tests was 97%, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The detection limit for the One-Step LAMP assay was 1 × 10
conclusionsThe results showed that the One-Step LAMP assay is an efficient consistent technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2 among suspected individuals due to its simplicity, speed, low cost, sensitivity, and specificity. Therefore, it has great potential as a useful diagnostic tool for disease epidemic control, timely treatment, and public health protection, especially in poor and underdeveloped countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.