Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882579›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

MRI-based vertebral bone quality score compared to quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density in patients undergoing cervical spinal surgery.

Lisa Oezel, Ichiro Okano, Conor Jones, Stephan N Salzmann, Jennifer Shue, Dominik Adl Amini, Manuel Moser, Erika Chiapparelli, Andrew A Sama, John A Carrino and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The clinical impact of MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for assessment of bone quality.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Modified vertebral bone quality score is a better predictor of cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and is superior to vertebral bone quality score.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictive value of vertebral specificity of bone mineral density for cage subsidence among patients undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: a retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Would Roussouly classification affect the diagnostic efficiency of vertebral bone quality score for assessing osteopenia or osteoporosis in lumbar degenerative disease?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  13. [Advances in MRI-based bone quality scoring systems and their clinical applications].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Lisa OezelSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Ichiro OkanoSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Conor JonesSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Stephan N SalzmannSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jennifer ShueSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Dominik Adl AminiSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Manuel MoserSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Erika ChiapparelliSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Andrew A SamaSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
John A CarrinoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Frank P CammisaSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Federico P GirardiSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Alexander P HughesSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. hughesa@hss.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-9672
Hospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was introduced as a bone quality marker in the lumbar spine. Prior studies showed that it could be utilized as a predictor of osteoporotic fracture or complications after instrumented spine surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between VBQ scores and bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computer tomography (QCT) in the cervical spine.

methodsPreoperative cervical CT and sagittal T1-weighted MRIs from patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and included. The VBQ score in each cervical level was calculated by dividing the signal intensity of the vertebral body by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid on midsagittal T1-weighted MRI images and correlated with QCT measurements of the C2-T1 vertebral bodies. A total of 102 patients (37.3% female) were included.

resultsVBQ values of C2-T1 vertebrae strongly correlated with each other. C2 showed the highest VBQ value [Median (range) 2.33 (1.33, 4.23)] and T1 showed the lowest VBQ value [Median (range) 1.64 (0.81, 3.88)]. There was significant weak to moderate negative correlations between and VBQ Scores for all levels [C2: p < 0.001; C3: p < 0.001; C4: p < 0.001; C5: p < 0.004; C6: p < 0.001; C7: p < 0.025; T1: p < 0.001].

conclusionOur results indicate that cervical VBQ scores may be insufficient in the estimation of BMDs, which might limit their clinical application. Additional studies are recommended to determine the utility of VBQ and QCT BMD to evaluate their potential use as bone status markers.

Indexed as

Bone DensityTomography, X-Ray ComputedCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)Bone mineral densityOsteoporosisQuantitative computed tomography (QCT)Vertebral bone quality score (VBQ Score)

Identifiers

PMID36882579
OpenAlexW4323366175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.