Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882570›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

Simultaneous sulfate and nitrate reduction in coastal sediments.

O M Bourceau, T Ferdelman, G Lavik, M Mussmann, M M M Kuypers, H K Marchant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

O M BourceauMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-0973
T FerdelmanMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-3793
G LavikMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
M MussmannUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Djerassiplatz 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
M M M KuypersMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-5091
H K MarchantMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany. hmarchan@mpi-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-9165
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oscillating redox conditions that characterize coastal sandy sediments foster microbial communities capable of respiring oxygen and nitrate simultaneously, thereby increasing the potential for organic matter remineralization, nitrogen (N)-loss and emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide. It is unknown to what extent these conditions also lead to overlaps between dissimilatory nitrate and sulfate respiration. Here, we show that sulfate and nitrate respiration co-occur in the surface sediments of an intertidal sand flat. Furthermore, we found strong correlations between dissimilatory nitrite reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and sulfate reduction rates. Until now, the nitrogen and sulfur cycles were assumed to be mainly linked in marine sediments by the activity of nitrate-reducing sulfide oxidisers. However, transcriptomic analyses revealed that the functional marker gene for DNRA (nrfA) was more associated with microorganisms known to reduce sulfate rather than oxidise sulfide. Our results suggest that when nitrate is supplied to the sediment community upon tidal inundation, part of the sulfate reducing community may switch respiratory strategy to DNRA. Therefore increases in sulfate reduction rate in-situ may result in enhanced DNRA and reduced denitrification rates. Intriguingly, the shift from denitrification to DNRA did not influence the amount of N

Identifiers

PMID36882570
PMCPMC9992702
OpenAlexW4323535615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.