ArticleScientific reports2023
Serum metabolomic profile of hair dye use.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal relationships between plasma metabolites and prostate cancer: A Mendelian randomization study exploring immune and inflammatory mediators.Current urology · 2026Article
- Causal Relationship Between Blood Metabolites and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2025Article
- Genetically Predicted 1400 Blood Metabolites in Relation to Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Article
- Serum Erythritol and Risk of Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in a Cohort of Men.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Associations between use of chemical hair products and epigenetic age: Findings from the Sister Study.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Elucidating the causal relationship between 486 genetically predicted blood metabolites and the risk of gastric cancer: a comprehensive Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that some chemicals in hair dyes are probably carcinogenic to those exposed to them occupationally. Biological mechanisms through which hair dye use may be related to human metabolism and cancer risk are not well-established. We conducted the first serum metabolomic examination comparing hair dye users and nonusers in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. Metabolite assays were conducted using ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The association between metabolite levels and hair dye use was estimated using linear regression, adjusting for age, body mass index, smoking, and multiple comparisons. Among the 1,401 detected metabolites, 11 compounds differed significantly between the two groups, including four amino acids and three xenobiotics. Redox-related glutathione metabolism was heavily represented, with L-cysteinylglycine disulfide showing the strongest association with hair dye (effect size (β) = - 0.263; FDR adjusted p-value = 0.0311), along with cysteineglutathione disulfide (β = - 0.685; FDR adjusted p-value = 0.0312). 5alpha-Androstan-3alpha,17beta-diol disulfate was reduced in hair dye users (β = - 0.492; FDR adjusted p-value = 0.077). Several compounds related to antioxidation/ROS and other pathways differed significantly between hair dye users and nonusers, including metabolites previously associated with prostate cancer. Our findings suggest possible biological mechanisms through which the use of hair dye could be associated with human metabolism and cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.