ArticleScientific reports2023
Novel methods for reliability study of multi-dimensional non-linear dynamic systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV deathrate prediction by Gaidai multivariate risks assessment method.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Future worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic predictions by Gaidai multivariate risk evaluation method.Analytical science advances · 2024Article
- Dementia death rates prediction.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Oil tanker under ice loadings.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Gaidai reliability method for long-term coronavirus modelling.F1000Research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research presents two unique techniques for engineering system reliability analysis of multi-dimensional non-linear dynamic structures. First, the structural reliability technique works best for multi-dimensional structural responses that have been either numerically simulated or measured over a long enough length to produce an ergodic time series. Second, a novel extreme value prediction method that can be used in various engineering applications is proposed. In contrast to those currently used in engineering reliability methodologies, the novel method is easy to use, and even a limited amount of data can still be used to obtain robust system failure estimates. As demonstrated in this work, proposed methods also provide accurate confidence bands for system failure levels in the case of real-life measured structural response. Additionally, traditional reliability approaches that deal with time series do not have the benefit of being able to handle a system's high dimensionality and cross-correlation across several dimensions readily. Container ship that experiences significant deck panel pressures and high roll angles when travelling in bad weather was selected as the example for this study. The main concern for ship transportation is the potential loss of cargo owing to violent movements. Simulating such a situation is difficult since waves and ship motions are non-stationary and complicatedly non-linear. Extreme movements greatly enhance the role of nonlinearities, activating effects of second and higher order. Furthermore, laboratory testing may also be called into doubt due to the scale and the choice of the sea state. Therefore, data collected from actual ships during difficult weather journeys offer a unique perspective on the statistics of ship movements. This work aims to benchmark state-of-the-art methods, making it possible to extract necessary information about the extreme response from available on-board measured time histories. Both suggested methods can be used in combination, making them attractive and ready to use for engineers. Methods proposed in this paper open up possibilities to predict simply yet efficiently system failure probability for non-linear multi-dimensional dynamic structure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.