ArticleBMJ open2023
Effect of and the association between vitamin D and outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques among infertile men and women: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D and Diabetes: Exploring the Link, Prevention, and Management.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- [Resolution of the national interdisciplinary council of experts "High-dose vitamin D (Devilam) in the practice of an obstetrician-gynecologist"].Problemy endokrinologii · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVitamin D is associated with many functions of the human reproductive system. Accordingly, it seems that on infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction technology (ART), treatment outcomes may be affected by the vitamin D. This overview aims to show the effect of vitamin D on infertility treatments outcomes in recent studies by concluding systematic reviews and meta-analyses to achieve a comprehensive result. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This overview protocol is being reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. We will include all peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials published from inception until December 2022. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase will be searched from the time of publication of the first articles onwards with a comprehensive search strategy. Endnote V.X7 software (Thomson Reuters, New York, New York, USA) will be used to store and manage records. The results will align with guidelines in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This overview will be evaluating the effect of vitamin D status and vitamin D supplementing on results of ART in women and men who are undergoing treatment for infertility. The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency worldwide and its effects on an important issue such as human fertility might be a very influential factor that leads scientists to strongly recommend its use. However, the more critical concern is that there is no definitive agreement in studies on the relationship between vitamin D and an increased chance of better fertility in men and women undergoing infertility treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021252752.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.