Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882210›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Telemedicine perceptions and experiences of socially vulnerable households during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Alayne M Adams, Khandideh K A Williams, Jennifer C Langill, Mylene Arsenault, Isabelle Leblanc, Kimberly Munro, Jeannie Haggerty

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alayne M AdamsDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que. alayne.adams@mcgill.ca.
Khandideh K A WilliamsDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que.
Jennifer C LangillDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que.
Mylene ArsenaultDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que.
Isabelle LeblancDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que.
Kimberly MunroDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que.
Jeannie HaggertyDepartment of Family Medicine (Adams, Williams, Arsenault, Leblanc, Munro, Haggerty); Department of Geography (Langill), McGill University; Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) Herzl Family Practice Centre (Arsenault); GMF-U St. Mary's Family Medicine Centre (Leblanc); GMF-U Village Santé (Munro), CLSC Site Parc-Extension; St. Mary's Research Centre (Haggerty), Montréal, Que.
Williams (United States) · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly in the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts to decrease risk of viral transmission triggered an abrupt shift from ambulatory health care delivery toward telemedicine. In this study, we explore the perceptions and experiences of telemedicine among socially vulnerable households and suggest strategies to increase equity in telemedicine access.

methodsConducted between August 2020 and February 2021, this exploratory qualitative study involved in-depth interviews with members of socially vulnerable households needing health care. Participants were recruited from a food bank and primary care practice in Montréal. Digitally recorded telephone interviews focused on experiences and perceptions related to telemedicine access and use. In our thematic analysis, we employed the framework method to facilitate comparison, and the identification of patterns and themes.

resultsTwenty-nine participants were interviewed, 48% of whom presented as women. Almost all sought health care in the early stages of the pandemic, 69% of which was received via telemedicine. Four themes emerged from the analysis: delays in seeking health care owing to competing priorities and perceptions that COVID-19-related health care took precedence; challenges with appointment booking and logistics given complex online systems, administrative inefficiencies, long wait times and missed calls; issues around quality and continuity of care; and conditional acceptance of telemedicine for certain health problems, and in exceptional circumstances.

interpretationEarly in the pandemic, participants report telemedicine delivery did not accommodate the diverse needs and capacities of socially vulnerable populations. Patient education, logistical support and care delivery by a trusted provider are suggested solutions, in addition to policies supporting digital equity and quality standards to promote telemedicine access and appropriate use.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPerinatal CarePolicyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36882210
PMCPMC10000894
OpenAlexW4323357039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.