ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2023
Inner surface modification of polyurethane ureteral stents using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition to improve the resistance to encrustation in a pig model.
Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Additive Manufacturing of Polymeric Bioresorbable Stents: A Mechanical Performance Perspective.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Comparison of encrustation between silicon-covered and polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent,Investigative and clinical urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe developed a ureteral stent with a non-fouling inner surface using plasma micro-surface modification technology. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this stent in animal model. MATERIALS AND
methodsUreteral stents were placed in five Yorkshire pigs. A bare stent was inserted on one side and an inner surface-modified stent was inserted on the other side. Two weeks after stenting, laparotomy was performed to harvest the ureteral stents. The changes in the inner surface were grossly evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). In addition, if encrustation was observed, the components were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Urine cultures were used for safety assessment.
resultsIn all models, urine cultures did not show any bacterial growth before and after stenting, and stent-related complications were not identified. Hard materials were palpable in four bare models. Palpable material was not identified in the modified stent. Calcium oxalate dihydrate/uric acid stones were identified in two bare stents. In the SEM images with EDS, biofilm formation was confirmed in the bare stents. Biofilm formation was significantly less on the inner surface of the modified stent, and the intact surface of the modified stent was larger than that of the bare stent.
conclusionsThe application of a specialized, plasma-enhanced, chemical vapor deposition technology to the inner surface of ureteral stents was safe and showed resistance to biofilm formation and encrustation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.