Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882171›Full record

ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2023

Microbiome in urological diseases: Axis crosstalk and bladder disorders.

Hae Woong Choi, Kwang Woo Lee, Young Ho Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. How is the human microbiome linked to kidney stones?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hae Woong ChoiDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-1875
Kwang Woo LeeDepartment of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8882-2492
Young Ho KimDepartment of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea. yhkuro@schmc.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-3959-0928
Soonchunhyang University · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the identification of the human urinary microbiome, numerous studies have characterized this microbial community and improved our knowledge of its association with urinary diseases. This association between urinary diseases and microbiota is not confined to the urinary microbiota; it is interconnected with the microbiota of other organs. The gastrointestinal, vaginal, kidney, and bladder microbiota all affect urinary diseases because they work with their respective organs to control the growth and operation of the immune, metabolic, and nervous systems through dynamic bidirectional communication along the bladder-centered axis. Therefore, disturbances in the microbial communities may result in the emergence of urinary diseases. In this review, we describe the increasing and intriguing evidence of complicated and critical relationships that may contribute to the development and progression of urinary diseases through disruption of the microbiota in various organs.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemaleHumansKidneyUrinary BladderHost microbial interactionsMicrobiotaUrinary bladder diseases

Identifiers

PMID36882171
PMCPMC9995957
OpenAlexW4322578178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.