Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2023
Cluster-Randomized Trial Comparing Ambulatory Decision Support Tools to Improve Heart Failure Care.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05275920 (Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations - Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations - Heart Failure (BETTER CARE-HF)
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines when treating cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Model Recommendations for Heart Failure Therapy.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in an Integrated Health System and Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Thematic Qualitative Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- A Pragmatic Trial Evaluating the Impact of the Anumana Clinical Decision Support Tool for Guideline-Directed Management of Heart Failure (ACT-HF): Clinical trial design and methods.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- The challenges of using electronic medical records (EMR) to facilitate guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Nudges in A Learning Health System: Applications to Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Care.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Care in Action: From Learning to Implementation in Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Transforming Population Health Screening for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease with AI-Enhanced ECG Analytics: Opportunities and Challenges.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Nurse-Led, Remote Optimisation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Across Australia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Direct-to-Physician Marketing and Uptake of Optimal Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Article
- Electronic health record nudges to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- A multicenter pragmatic implementation study of AI-ECG-based clinical decision support software to identify low LVEF: Clinical trial design and methods.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in aortic stenosis within a universal healthcare system characterized by natural language processing for targeted intervention.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Cardiologist perceptions on automated alerts and messages to improve heart failure care.American heart journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cardiovascular Quality Improvement Strategy in India: The C-QIP Trial.American heart journal · 2024Article
- From Hospital to Home: Evidence-Based Care for Worsening Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- Concordance With Screening and Treatment Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Implementation Science to Achieve Equity in Heart Failure Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Impact of Visit Volume on the Effectiveness of Electronic Tools to Improve Heart Failure Care.JACC. Heart failure · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are underprescribed for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
objectivesThis study sought to compare effectiveness of 2 automated, electronic health record-embedded tools vs usual care on MRA prescribing in eligible patients with HFrEF.
methodsBETTER CARE-HF (Building Electronic Tools to Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations for Heart Failure) was a 3-arm, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of an alert during individual patient encounters vs a message about multiple patients between encounters vs usual care on MRA prescribing. This study included adult patients with HFrEF, no active MRA prescription, no contraindication to MRAs, and an outpatient cardiologist in a large health system. Patients were cluster-randomized by cardiologist (60 per arm).
resultsThe study included 2,211 patients (alert: 755, message: 812, usual care [control]: 644), with average age 72.2 years, average ejection fraction 33%, who were predominantly male (71.4%) and White (68.9%). New MRA prescribing occurred in 29.6% of patients in the alert arm, 15.6% in the message arm, and 11.7% in the control arm. The alert more than doubled MRA prescribing compared to usual care (relative risk: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.77-3.62; P < 0.0001) and improved MRA prescribing compared to the message (relative risk: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.21-2.29; P = 0.002). The number of patients with alert needed to result in an additional MRA prescription was 5.6.
conclusionsAn automated, patient-specific, electronic health record-embedded alert increased MRA prescribing compared to both a message and usual care. These findings highlight the potential for electronic health record-embedded tools to substantially increase prescription of life-saving therapies for HFrEF. (Building Electronic Tools to Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations-Heart Failure [BETTER CARE-HF]; NCT05275920).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.