Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881929›Full record

Observational studyArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2023

Informant Characteristics Influence Reports of Participant Functioning and their Associations with Neuropsychological Performance in Non-Hispanic Black Adults.

Lisa V Graves, Sharon Hamill, Maiya Larry, Destiny Williams

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Study partner characteristics moderate the prediction of cognitive decline in aging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa V GravesPsychology Department, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-8745
Sharon HamillPsychology Department, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, USA.
Maiya LarryPsychology Department, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, USA.
Destiny WilliamsDepartment of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and Counseling, California State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA.
California State University, San Marcos · USCalifornia State University, San Bernardino · US

Funding

National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
Translational and Therapeutics CoreP30AG072959 · NIA · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Mark J Lowe · 2021 to 2026
$23.9M
San Diego Resource Center for advancing Alzheimer's Research in Minority Seniors (ARMS)P30AG059299 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JOHN P. ELDER, PAUL E GILBERT · 2018 to 2026
$7.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059299NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072959NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072122NIH HHS P30 AG059299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssessing one's functional capacity-in addition to neuropsychological performance-is essential for determining neurocognitive status, and functional assessment is often provided via informant report. Although informant characteristics have been shown to influence reports of participant functioning, the degree to which they moderate relationships between reported functioning and participant performance on neuropsychological testing is unclear. Moreover, associations among informant characteristics, reported functioning, and neuropsychological performance have not been adequately examined with non-Hispanic Black (NHB) samples, despite this population's disproportionately high risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

methodIn this cross-sectional observational study, we examined the influence of informant characteristics on informant reports of participant functioning (assessed via the Functional Activities Questionnaire [FAQ]) and associations between reported functioning and participant performance on neuropsychological testing, among NHB adult participants in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center cohort (n = 1024).

resultsInformants who were younger, female, more educated, knew participants longer, or lived with participants reported poorer participant functioning (p < .001). However, younger (vs. older) informants provided reports of functioning that were more predictive of visuoconstructional ability and visual memory, and male (vs. female) informants provided reports of functioning that were more predictive of verbal memory, visuoconstructional ability and visual memory, and language (ps < .001).

conclusionsWithin the context of neurocognitive evaluations of NHB participants, informant characteristics may influence subjective reports of participants' functioning and the extent to which reported functioning corroborates objective participant performance on neuropsychological testing.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMemoryNeuropsychological TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesAlzheimer’s diseaseAssessmentCross-cultural/minorityDementiaEveryday functioning

Identifiers

PMID36881929
PMCPMC10599608
OpenAlexW4323347210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.