Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881686›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023

Voluntary or reluctant? Social influence in charitable giving: an ERP study.

Qiang Xu, Shengnan He, Zhurong Li, Ran Duan, Peng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiang XuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8778-3957
Shengnan HeDepartment of Moral Education, The 21st Primary School Xiangzhou Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Zhurong LiSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Ran DuanSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Peng LiSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9330-5713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social information has substantial influences on prosocial behavior. In this study, we performed an event-related potential (ERP) experiment to examine the effect of social influence on giving. The participants were allowed to form an initial decision on how much money to donate to a charity provided the program's average donation amount and to make a second donation decision. Social influence varied in different directions (upward, downward and equal) by altering the relative donation amount between the average donation amount and the participants' first donation amount. The behavioral results showed that participants increased their donation amount in the upward condition and decreased it in the downward condition. The ERP results revealed that upward social information evoked larger feedback-related negativity (FRN) amplitudes and smaller P3 amplitudes than in the downward and equal conditions. Furthermore, the pressure ratings, rather than the happiness ratings, were associated with the FRN patterns across the three conditions. We argue that people in social situations are more likely to increase their donations owing to pressure than voluntary altruism. Our study provides the first ERP evidence that different directions of social information evoke different neural responses in time course processing.

Indexed as

EmotionsEvoked PotentialsAltruismCharitiesHumanscharitable givingFRNP3social influencesocial pressure

Identifiers

PMID36881686
PMCPMC10013733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.