Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881627›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Darwinian evolution as a dynamical principle.

Charles D Kocher, Ken A Dill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Human and bats genome robustness under COSMIC mutational signatures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Origins of Life: The Protein Folding Problem all over again?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. The prebiotic emergence of biological evolution.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles D KocherLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.
Ken A DillLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.

Funding

John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 62564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darwinian evolution (DE)-biology's powerful process of adaptation-is remarkably different from other known dynamical processes. It is antithermodynamic, driving away from equilibrium; it has persisted for 3.5 billion years; and its target, fitness, can seem like "Just So" stories. For insights, we make a computational model. In the Darwinian Evolution Machine (DEM) model, resource-driven duplication and competition operate inside a cycle of search/compete/choose. We find the following: 1) DE requires multiorganism coexistence for its long-term persistence and ability to cross fitness valleys. 2) DE is driven by resource dynamics, like booms and busts, not just by mutational change. And, 3) fitness ratcheting requires a mechanistic separation between variation and selection steps, perhaps explaining biology's use of separate polymers, DNA and proteins.

Indexed as

competitive exclusionDarwinian evolutiondriven nonequilibriumsurvival of the fittest

Identifiers

PMID36881627
PMCPMC10089213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.