Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881448›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

Development of a Secondary Prevention Smartphone App for Students With Unhealthy Alcohol Use: Results From a Qualitative Assessment.

Nicolas Bertholet, Elodie Schmutz, John A Cunningham, Jennifer McNeely, Gerhard Gmel, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Véronique S Grazioli

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas BertholetAddiction Medicine Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-6377
Elodie SchmutzAddiction Medicine Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-0581
John A CunninghamNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-5982
Jennifer McNeelySection on Tobacco, Alcohol and Drug Use, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4601-6940
Gerhard GmelAddiction Medicine Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9403-9405
Jean-Bernard DaeppenAddiction Medicine Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-1393
Véronique S GrazioliDepartment of Vulnerabilities and Social Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-7712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite considerable efforts devoted to the development of prevention interventions aiming at reducing unhealthy alcohol use in tertiary students, their delivery remains often challenging. Interventions including information technology are promising given their potential to reach large parts of the population.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a secondary prevention smartphone app with an iterative qualitative design involving the target population.

methodsThe app development process included testing a first prototype and a second prototype, developed based on the results of 2 consecutive qualitative assessments. Participants (aged ≥18 years, screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use) were students from 4 tertiary education institutions in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. Participants tested prototype 1 or prototype 2 or both and provided feedback in 1-to-1 semistructured interviews after 2-3 weeks of testing.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 23.3 years. A total of 9 students (4/9 female) tested prototype 1 and participated in qualitative interviews. A total of 11 students (6/11 female) tested prototype 2 (6 who tested prototype 1 and 5 new) and participated in semistructured interviews. Content analysis identified 6 main themes: "General Acceptance of the App," "Importance of the Targeted and Relevant App Content," "Importance of Credibility," "Importance of the App Usability," "Importance of a Simple and Attractive Design," "Importance of Notifications to Ensure App Use over Time." Besides a general acceptance of the app, these themes reflected participants' recommendations toward increased usability; to improve the design; to include useful and rewarding contents; to make the app look serious and credible; and to add notifications to ensure its use over time. A total of 11 students tested prototype 2 (6 who tested prototype 1 and 5 new) and participated in semistructured interviews. The 6 same themes emerged from the analysis. Participants from phase 1 generally found the design and content of the app improved.

conclusionsStudents recommend prevention smartphone apps to be easy to use, useful, rewarding, serious, and credible. These findings may be important to consider when developing prevention smartphone apps to increase the likelihood of app use over time.

trial registrationISRCTN registry 10007691; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10007691. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s13063-020-4145-2.

Indexed as

alcoholalcohol-related secondary preventionappmHealthmobile appmobile phonequalitativesmartphonetertiary studentsuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID36881448
PMCPMC10031438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read13
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.