Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881444›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Combining Experience Sampling and Mobile Sensing for Digital Phenotyping With m-Path Sense: Performance Study.

Koen Niemeijer, Merijn Mestdagh, Stijn Verdonck, Kristof Meers, Peter Kuppens

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Koen NiemeijerFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-534X
Merijn MestdaghFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-861X
Stijn VerdonckFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-1072
Kristof MeersFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-7712
Peter KuppensFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-2356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience sampling methodology (ESM) has long been considered as the gold standard for gathering data in everyday life. In contrast, current smartphone technology enables us to acquire data that are much richer, more continuous, and unobtrusive than is possible via ESM. Although data obtained from smartphones, known as mobile sensing, can provide useful information, its stand-alone usefulness is limited when not combined with other sources of information such as data from ESM studies. Currently, there are few mobile apps available that allow researchers to combine the simultaneous collection of ESM and mobile sensing data. Furthermore, such apps focus mostly on passive data collection with only limited functionality for ESM data collection.

objectiveIn this paper, we presented and evaluated the performance of m-Path Sense, a novel, full-fledged, and secure ESM platform with background mobile sensing capabilities.

methodsTo create an app with both ESM and mobile sensing capabilities, we combined m-Path, a versatile and user-friendly platform for ESM, with the Copenhagen Research Platform Mobile Sensing framework, a reactive cross-platform framework for digital phenotyping. We also developed an R package, named mpathsenser, which extracts raw data to an SQLite database and allows the user to link and inspect data from both sources. We conducted a 3-week pilot study in which we delivered ESM questionnaires while collecting mobile sensing data to evaluate the app's sampling reliability and perceived user experience. As m-Path is already widely used, the ease of use of the ESM system was not investigated.

resultsData from m-Path Sense were submitted by 104 participants, totaling 69.51 GB (430.43 GB after decompression) or approximately 37.50 files or 31.10 MB per participant per day. After binning accelerometer and gyroscope data to 1 value per second using summary statistics, the entire SQLite database contained 84,299,462 observations and was 18.30 GB in size. The reliability of sampling frequency in the pilot study was satisfactory for most sensors, based on the absolute number of collected observations. However, the relative coverage rate-the ratio between the actual and expected number of measurements-was below its target value. This could mostly be ascribed to gaps in the data caused by the operating system pushing away apps running in the background, which is a well-known issue in mobile sensing. Finally, some participants reported mild battery drain, which was not considered problematic for the assessed participants' perceived user experience.

conclusionsTo better study behavior in everyday life, we developed m-Path Sense, a fusion of both m-Path for ESM and Copenhagen Research Platform Mobile Sensing. Although reliable passive data collection with mobile phones remains challenging, it is a promising approach toward digital phenotyping when combined with ESM.

Indexed as

ambulatory assessmentdigital phenotypingecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingmHealthmobile healthmobile phonemobile sensingpassive sensingsmartphones

Identifiers

PMID36881444
PMCPMC10031448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read46
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.