Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881407›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Spatial Resolution Evaluation Based on Experienced Visual Categories With Sweep Evoked Periodic EEG Activity.

Coralie Hemptinne, Nathan Hupin, Aliette Lochy, Demet Yüksel, Bruno Rossion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Coralie HemptinneInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Nathan HupinInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Aliette LochyCognitive Science and Assessment Institute, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Demet YükselInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Bruno RossionInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Visual function is typically evaluated in clinical settings with visual acuity (VA), a test requiring to behaviorally match or name optotypes such as tumbling E or Snellen letters. The ability to recognize these symbols has little in common with the automatic and rapid visual recognition of socially important stimuli in real life. Here we use sweep visual evoked potentials to assess spatial resolution objectively based on the recognition of human faces and written words. Methods: To this end, we tested unfamiliar face individuation1 and visual word recognition2 in 15 normally sighted adult volunteers with a 68-electrode electroencephalogram system. Results: Unlike previous measures of low-level visual function including VA, the most sensitive electrode was found at an electrode different from Oz in a majority of participants. Thresholds until which faces and words could be recognized were evaluated at the most sensitive electrode defined individually for each participant. Word recognition thresholds corresponded with the VA level expected from normally sighted participants, and even a VA significantly higher than expected from normally sighted individuals for a few participants. Conclusions: Spatial resolution can be evaluated based on high-level stimuli encountered in day-to-day life, such as faces or written words with sweep visual evoked potentials.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualVision, LowAdultElectrodesElectroencephalographyHumansVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID36881407
PMCPMC10007901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.