ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2023
Sudden Death in Men Versus Women with Heart Failure.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global, regional, and national characteristics and incidence of sudden death from 1948 to 2022: a systematic review and modelling study.Journal of global health · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting sudden cardiac death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Pregnancy, Reproductive Factors, and Female Heart Failure Risk and Outcomes.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Tachycardia Therapies: Past, Present and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSudden cardiac death (SCD) represents the most feared complication of heart failure (HF). This review intends to provide insight on our current knowledge of sex differences in SCD mechanisms, prevention, and management in HF patients. RECENT
findingsWomen with HF present a better prognosis than men and have a lower incidence of SCD, irrespective of the presence of ischemic heart disease and age. The influence of sex hormones, sex differences in intracellular calcium handling, and a differential myocardial remodeling may explain such a gap between men and women. Both HF drugs and ventricular arrhythmias ablation seems also useful for the management of women at risk of SCD, but special care must be taken with the use of antiarrhythmic QT-prolonging drugs. However, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) use has not been shown to be equally effective in women than men. Sex-specific recommendations regarding SCD in HF are still lacking due to the scarcity of information and the under-representation of women in clinical trials. Further investigation is required to provide specific risk stratification models in women. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, genetics development, and personalized medicine will probably play an increasing role in this evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.