Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881288›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2023

Quality Improvement in the Management of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Current State and Future Directions.

Aaron Kaplan, Safa Kaleem, Margaret Huynh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron KaplanDepartment of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, NY, New York, USA.
Safa KaleemDepartment of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, NY, New York, USA.
Margaret HuynhDepartment of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, NY, New York, USA. mah9335@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2625-0353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage carries high mortality and morbidity. Quality improvement (QI) efforts in the management of this disease process are growing as the field of neurocritical care matures. This review provides updates in QI in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and discusses gaps and future directions. RECENT

findingsLiterature published on the topic over the past 3 years were evaluated. An assessment of current QI practices pertaining to the acute care of SAH was conducted. These include processes surrounding acute pain management, inter-hospital coordination of care, complications during the initial hospital stay, role of palliative care, and quality metrics collection, reporting, and monitoring. SAH QI initiatives have shown promise by decreasing ICU and hospital lengths of stay, health care costs, and hospital complications. The review reveals substantial heterogeneity, variability, and limitations in SAH QI protocols, measures, and reporting. Uniformity in QI research, implementation, and monitoring will be crucial as disease-specific QI develops in neurological care.

Indexed as

Subarachnoid HemorrhageCritical CareHumansLength of StayPain ManagementQuality ImprovementNeurocritical carePerformance measureQualityQuality improvementSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID36881288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.