Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881207›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2023

Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus.

Nicole Erickson, Erin Stella Sullivan, Marianna Kalliostra, Alessandro Laviano, Joost Wesseling

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimizing Clinical Nutrition Management for Elderly Hospitalized Patients: Current Practices and Insights.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Illuminating the nutrition-related policy-practice gaps in colorectal cancer survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 6 countries.

Nicole Erickson *Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Hospital, Munich, Germany. nicole.erickson@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-7689
Erin Stella Sullivan *Writing Group, The European Union Thematic Network on Integrated Nutrition in Cancer Care (INC2), Croydon, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8343-3415
Marianna KalliostraWriting Group, The European Union Thematic Network on Integrated Nutrition in Cancer Care (INC2), Croydon, UK.
Alessandro LavianoWriting Group, The European Union Thematic Network on Integrated Nutrition in Cancer Care (INC2), Croydon, UK.
Joost WesselingWriting Group, The European Union Thematic Network on Integrated Nutrition in Cancer Care (INC2), Croydon, UK.
European Association of Urology · NLUniversity Alliance · GBUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While healthcare is becoming more patient-centred, evidence-based nutrition interventions are still not accessible to all patients with cancer. As nutrition interventions directly improve clinical and socioeconomic outcomes, patient-centred care is not complete without nutrition care. While awareness of the negative impact of malnutrition on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and functional and emotional wellbeing in cancer is growing, there is relatively poor awareness amongst patients, clinicians, policymakers, and payers that nutrition interventions -particularly those begun in the early stages of the disease course- are an effective method for improving such outcomes. The European Beating Cancer Plan recognises the need for a holistic approach to cancer but lacks actionable recommendations to implement integrated nutrition cancer care at member state level. When considering nutrition care as a human right, the impact on quality of life and functional status must be prioritized, as these may be equally as important to patients, especially in advanced cancer where improvements in clinical outcomes such as survival or tumour burden may not be attainable. We formulate actions needed at the regional and the European level to ensure integrated nutrition care for all patients with cancer. The 4 main Take Home Messages are as follows: 1. The goals of Europe's Beating Cancer Plan cannot be achieved without integrating nutrition across the cancer care continuum. 2. Malnutrition negatively impacts clinical outcomes and has socioeconomic consequences for patients and healthcare systems. 3. Championing integrating nutrition care into cancer care is therefore the duty and ethical responsibility of clinicians (Hippocratic Oath-primum non nocere) and 4. Nutrition care is a cost effective, evidence-based therapy.

Indexed as

MalnutritionQuality of LifeContinuity of Patient CareDisease ProgressionHumansCancerClinical outcomesDietitianEuropean beating cancer planMalunutritionMultidisciplinary teamNutritionPatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID36881207
PMCPMC9992033
OpenAlexW4323347299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.