Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881205›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2023

Possible candidates for splenic hilar nodal dissection among patients with upper advanced gastric cancer without invasion of the greater curvature.

Masashi Nishino, Takaki Yoshikawa, Masahiro Yura, Ryota Sakon, Kenichi Ishizu, Takeyuki Wada, Tsutomu Hayashi, Yukinori Yamagata

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Masashi NishinoGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takaki YoshikawaGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. tayoshik@ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-9484
Masahiro YuraGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Ryota SakonGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kenichi IshizuGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takeyuki WadaGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Tsutomu HayashiGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yukinori YamagataGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
National Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpleen preserving D2 total gastrectomy without dissection of the splenic hilar nodes (#10) is a standard operation for upper advanced gastric cancer without invasion of the greater curvature (UGC-wGC). However, some patients with #10 metastasis have survived after splenectomy with dissection of #10. This study explored possible candidates for dissection of #10 among patients with UGC-wGC by examining the metastatic rate and the therapeutic index.

methodsThis study retrospectively reviewed data of patients treated in National Cancer Center Hospital (Japan) between 2000 and 2012. We applied the following inclusion criteria: (1) ≥ D2 total gastrectomy with splenectomy, (2) UGC-wGC, and (3) gastric adenocarcinoma histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for #10 metastasis.

resultsA total of 366 patients were examined; #10 metastasis was observed in 4.4% (16/366). The multivariate analysis revealed that location (posterior vs. others, P = 0.025) and histology (undifferentiated vs. differentiated, P = 0.048) were significant factors for #10 metastasis among sex, age, tumor size, dominant circumferential location, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, and histology. The incidence of #10 metastasis was 14.9% (7/47) for tumors located on the posterior wall with undifferentiated type histology. The 5-year overall survival rate of these patients was 42.9%, and the therapeutic index was 6.38, which was the second highest value among the second-tier nodal stations.

conclusionEven for upper advanced gastric cancer without invasion of the greater curvature, dissection of #10 could be justified for tumors located on the posterior wall with undifferentiated type histology.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesRetrospective StudiesSpleenSplenectomySplenic hilar nodal dissectionTotal gastrectomy with splenectomyUpper advanced gastric cancer without invasion of the greater curvature

Identifiers

PMID36881205
OpenAlexW4323348298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.