SynthesisPediatric surgery international2023
Laparoscopic versus open portoenterostomy for treatment of biliary atresia: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-assisted vs. open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of different Kasai portoenterostomy techniques in the outcomes of biliary atresia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Pooled it
- Laparoscopic vs. open portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: a meta-analysis of pediatric surgical outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative outcomes of open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary Atresia patients progressing to liver transplantation: A Real-World cohort study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Comparison of surgical results and technical performance between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for Kasai portoenterostomy in biliary atresia: a multicenter retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: first experience from Central Asia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- A convenient nomogram for predicting early death or liver transplantation after the Kasai procedure in patients with biliary atresia.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur goal was to compare laparoscopic portoenterostomy versus open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing the databases EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane, we carried out a thorough literature search up to 2022. Studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of biliary atresia were included.
resultsTwenty-three studies comparing laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LPE) (n = 689) and open portoenterostomy (OPE) (n = 818) were considered appropriate for meta-analysis. Age at surgery time was lower in the LPE group than OPE group (I
conclusionsLaparoscopic portoenterostomy provides advantages regarding operative bleeding and the time to begin feeding. No differences in remain characteristics. Based on the data presented to us by this meta-analysis, LPE is not superior to OPE in terms of overall results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.