ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Quantitative evaluation of hepatic steatosis using attenuation imaging in a pediatric population: a prospective study.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) steatotic liver disease special interest group position paper on screening, diagnosis and investigation of paediatric metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Evolving B-mode ultrasound-based techniques for assessing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Now and beyond.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Assessing Quality of Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Results for Liver Fat Quantification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Ultrasound for the Detection of Possible Fatty Liver Disease in Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity and fatty-liver disease are increasingly common in children. Hepatic steatosis is becoming the most common cause of chronic liver disease during childhood. There is a need for noninvasive imaging methods that are easily accessible, safe and do not require sedation in the diagnosis and follow-up of the disease.
objectiveIn this study, the diagnostic role of ultrasound attenuation imaging (ATI) in the detection and staging of fatty liver in the pediatric age group was investigated using the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proton density fat fraction as the reference. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 140 children with both ATI and MRI constituted the study group. Fatty liver was classified as mild (S1, defined as ≥ 5% steatosis), moderate (S2, defined as ≥ 10% steatosis), or severe (S3, defined as ≥ 20% steatosis) according to MRI-proton density fat fraction values. MRI studies were performed on the same 1.5-tesla (T) MR device without sedation and contrast agent. Ultrasound examinations were performed independently by two radiology residents blinded to the MRI data.
resultsWhile no steatosis was detected in half of the cases, S1 steatosis was found in 31 patients (22.1%), S2 in 29 patients (20.7%) and S3 in 10 patients (7.1%). A strong correlation was found between attenuation coefficient and MRI-proton density fat fraction values (r = 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92; P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of ATI were calculated as 0.944 for S > 0, 0.976 for S > 1 and 0.970 for S > 2, based on 0.65, 0.74 and 0.91 dB/cm/MHz cut-off values, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the inter-observer agreement and test-retest reproducibility were calculated as 0.90 and 0.91, respectively.
conclusionUltrasound attenuation imaging is a promising noninvasive method for the quantitative evaluation of fatty liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.