ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[S3 guideline on skin cancer prevention: evaluation and updating procedure].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOriginally published in 2014, the S3 guideline "Prevention of skin cancer" is the first evidence-based guideline available exclusively for primary and secondary prevention, which summarizes interprofessional consented recommendations for skin cancer risk reduction and early detection. Due to the large number of new publications and expanding focus, an update was deemed necessary.
methodsAfter a structured needs assessment, key questions were prioritized. The resulting systematic literature search resulted in a three-stage screening process. Recommendations formulated in working groups were approved in a formal consensus process, taking into account conflicts of interest, and finalized after a 6‑week public consultation process.
resultsThe needs assessment identified "skin cancer screening" (60.1%), "individual risk avoidance behaviors" (44.20%), and "risk factors" (43.48%) as topics of greatest interest. The prioritization phase resulted in 41 new key questions. A total of 22 key issues were re-evaluated in an evidence-based manner using 93 publications. As part of comprehensive guideline restructuring, 61 recommendations were newly developed and 43 were modified. The consultation phase resulted in no changes to recommendations and 33 changes to background material.
conclusionThe identified need for change resulted in extensive modification and redrafting of recommendations. As the target group "nononcology patients" cannot be identified via cancer registries or certification systems, no quality indicators can be derived from the guideline. To transfer the guideline to health care, innovative, addressee-specific concepts are required, which will be discussed and implemented during the preparation of the patient guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.