Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36881019›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Evolution of neural activity in circuits bridging sensory and abstract knowledge.

Francesca Mastrogiuseppe, Naoki Hiratani, Peter Latham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca MastrogiuseppeGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7682-5178
Naoki HirataniCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Harvard, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8568-2033
Peter LathamGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-9328

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110114/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to associate sensory stimuli with abstract classes is critical for survival. How are these associations implemented in brain circuits? And what governs how neural activity evolves during abstract knowledge acquisition? To investigate these questions, we consider a circuit model that learns to map sensory input to abstract classes via gradient-descent synaptic plasticity. We focus on typical neuroscience tasks (simple, and context-dependent, categorization), and study how both synaptic connectivity and neural activity evolve during learning. To make contact with the current generation of experiments, we analyze activity via standard measures such as selectivity, correlations, and tuning symmetry. We find that the model is able to recapitulate experimental observations, including seemingly disparate ones. We determine how, in the model, the behaviour of these measures depends on details of the circuit and the task. These dependencies make experimentally testable predictions about the circuitry supporting abstract knowledge acquisition in the brain.

Indexed as

LearningNeurosciencesBrainKnowledgeNeuronal Plasticitylearningneural networksneurosciencenoneplasticity

Identifiers

PMID36881019
PMCPMC9991064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.