Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36880951›Full record

ReviewRadiology2023

Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of Imaging.

Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Janet Alvarez, Dana M Omer, Marc J Gollub, J Joshua Smith, Iva Petkovska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Diagnostic performance of [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Practical integration of ctDNA-defined minimal residual disease in gastrointestinal cancers: testing windows and evidence-aligned management frameworks.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vetri Sudar JayaprakasamFrom the Departments of Radiology (V.S.J., M.J.G., I.P.) and Surgery (J.A., D.M.O., J.J.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-9867
Janet AlvarezFrom the Departments of Radiology (V.S.J., M.J.G., I.P.) and Surgery (J.A., D.M.O., J.J.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0001-7853-959X
Dana M OmerFrom the Departments of Radiology (V.S.J., M.J.G., I.P.) and Surgery (J.A., D.M.O., J.J.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-2540
Marc J GollubFrom the Departments of Radiology (V.S.J., M.J.G., I.P.) and Surgery (J.A., D.M.O., J.J.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-6008-0730
J Joshua SmithFrom the Departments of Radiology (V.S.J., M.J.G., I.P.) and Surgery (J.A., D.M.O., J.J.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-5456
Iva PetkovskaFrom the Departments of Radiology (V.S.J., M.J.G., I.P.) and Surgery (J.A., D.M.O., J.J.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-4373-6494

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer have evolved dramatically over the past several decades. At the same time, its incidence has increased in younger populations. This review will inform the reader of advances in both diagnosis and treatment. These advances have led to the watch-and-wait approach, otherwise known as nonsurgical management. This review briefly outlines changes in medical and surgical treatment, advances in MRI technology and interpretation, and landmark studies or trials that have led to this exciting juncture. Herein, the authors delve into current state-of-the-art methods to assess response to treatment with MRI and endoscopy. Currently, these methods for avoiding surgery can be used to detect a complete clinical response in as many as 50% of patients with rectal cancer. Finally, the limitations of imaging and endoscopy and future challenges will be discussed.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID36880951
PMCPMC10068893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.