Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36880020›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Real-World Experience Using Intravitreal Brolucizumab Alone or in Combination with Aflibercept in the Management of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Neesurg Mehta, Rodney D Fong, Machelle Wilson, Kareem Moussa, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Ala Moshiri, Glenn Yiu, Susanna S Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neesurg MehtaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Rodney D FongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9645-1049
Machelle WilsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Kareem MoussaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Parisa Emami-NaeiniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ala MoshiriDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Glenn YiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-3310
Susanna S ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5911-6671
University of California, Davis · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate real-world experience using intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr), alone or in combination with aflibercept, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated previously with other inhibitors of VEGF (anti-VEGF). Methods: This was a retrospective study of all eyes with nAMD treated with IVBr on a treat-and-extend protocol at a single center. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and final visit, and drug-related adverse events were analyzed. Eyes with recurrent macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks were treated with a combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every month. Results: Among 52 eyes (40 patients) on IVBr, all had been previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy, with 73% having persistent macular fluid. After a mean follow-up of 46.2±27.4 weeks on IVBr, the mean treatment interval for intravitreal therapy increased to 8.8±2.1 weeks on IVBr from a baseline of 6.1±3.1 weeks ( Conclusion: In the real world, IVBr used to treat eyes with nAMD previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapies appears to be well tolerated and associated with an improvement in macular fluid, stabilization of BCVA, and/or increase in intravitreal treatment interval. Combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept monthly appears to be well tolerated and can be considered for eyes with macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks.

Indexed as

afliberceptage-related macular degenerationanti-VEGFbrolucizumabintravitreal injection; optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID36880020
PMCPMC9984903
OpenAlexW4322505210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.