Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879990›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023

The MCL apprehension sign: A novel test for MCL instability.

Pranshu Agrawal, Rob Gilbert

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pranshu AgrawalSports Knee Unit, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
Rob GilbertSports Knee Unit, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study describes a new clinical sign to diagnose clinically relevant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury and evaluates its use in diagnosis and planning treatment for MCL injuries. Methods: A total of 30 consecutive patients with suspected MCL injury, visiting the sports knee clinic were screened by the senior author and the knee fellow for any clinical laxity. Of these, 9 patients did not have any clinically demonstrable laxity but did have MRI evidence of MCL injury. The presence of apprehension sign was compared against the standard criteria for MCL laxity and was evaluated as a novel test to diagnose clinically significant MCL laxity. Results: Of the 21 patients who were diagnosed to have MCL laxity, 18 had a positive apprehension sign at the time of presentation. Eight out of the nine patients who were negative for MCL laxity, did not have a demonstrable apprehension sign. According to the gold standard index, the apprehension sign had a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 88.8%. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.7% and 72.7% respectively. The pre-test probability of MCL laxity based on the diagnostic criteria was 70% and increased to 94.7% with a positive apprehension sign. Conclusions: A positive apprehension sign is suggestive of MCL injury requiring active treatment. It also helps in deciding the length of bracing required and the need for further operative treatment. The authors recommend its use as a reliable & reproducible adjunct to standard clinic-radiological work-up for MCL injuries.

Indexed as

Apprehension signBracingmcl injurymcl instabilityMedial collateral ligamentSports knee injury

Identifiers

PMID36879990
PMCPMC9984870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.