Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879904›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

The use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Claudia Brusasco, Francesco Corradi, Federico Dazzi, Alessandro Isirdi, Chiara Romei, Andrea Parisini, Silvia Boni, Gregorio Santori, Vito Brusasco, Galliera CPAP-COVID-19 study group and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia BrusascoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-6172
Francesco CorradiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-2608
Federico DazziDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro IsirdiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-1944
Chiara RomeiDepartment Radiology, 2nd Radiology Unit, Pisa University-Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea ParisiniE.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia BoniE.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Gregorio SantoriDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3764-2624
Vito BrusascoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Galliera CPAP-COVID-19 study group
Galliera CPAP-COVID-19 study group
University of Pisa · ITEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In a preliminary study during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave, we reported a high rate of success with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preventing death and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). That study, however, was too small to identify risk factors for mortality, barotrauma and impact on subsequent IMV. Thus, we re-evaluated the efficacy of the same CPAP protocol in a larger series of patients during second and third pandemic waves. Methods: 281 COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (158 full-code and 123 do-not-intubate (DNI)), were managed with high-flow CPAP early in their hospitalisation. IMV was considered after 4 days of unsuccessful CPAP. Results: The overall recovery rate from respiratory failure was 50% in the DNI and 89% in the full-code group. Among the latter, 71% recovered with CPAP-only, 3% died under CPAP and 26% were intubated after a median CPAP time of 7 days (IQR: 5-12 days). Of the patients who were intubated, 68% recovered and were discharged from the hospital within 28 days. Barotrauma occurred during CPAP in <4% of patients. Age (OR 1.128; p <0.001) and tomographic severity score (OR 1.139; p=0.006) were the only independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Early treatment with CPAP is a safe option for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID36879904
PMCPMC9675983
OpenAlexW4309183768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.