Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879884›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Genome-scale models as a vehicle for knowledge transfer from microbial to mammalian cell systems.

Benjamin Strain, James Morrissey, Athanasios Antonakoudis, Cleo Kontoravdi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin StrainDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
James MorrisseyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Athanasios AntonakoudisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Cleo KontoravdiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the plethora of omics data becoming available for mammalian cell and, increasingly, human cell systems, Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have emerged as a useful tool for their organisation and analysis. The systems biology community has developed an array of tools for the solution, interrogation and customisation of GEMs as well as algorithms that enable the design of cells with desired phenotypes based on the multi-omics information contained in these models. However, these tools have largely found application in microbial cells systems, which benefit from smaller model size and ease of experimentation. Herein, we discuss the major outstanding challenges in the use of GEMs as a vehicle for accurately analysing data for mammalian cell systems and transferring methodologies that would enable their use to design strains and processes. We provide insights on the opportunities and limitations of applying GEMs to human cell systems for advancing our understanding of health and disease. We further propose their integration with data-driven tools and their enrichment with cellular functions beyond metabolism, which would, in theory, more accurately describe how resources are allocated intracellularly.

Indexed as

Flux balance analysisHuman pathophysiologyMammalian cell metabolismResource allocation models

Identifiers

PMID36879884
PMCPMC9984296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.