Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879790›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in health in Hong Kong: insights and lessons from the UK and Australia.

Gary Ka-Ki Chung, Mark Robinson, Michael Marmot, Jean Woo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07123064 (Alleviating Loneliness in Older Adults Living in Poverty), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07123064 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Alleviating Loneliness in Older Adults Living in Poverty: A Multi-level Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorEducation University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2029Enrolled1,344ConditionsLoneliness, PovertyArmsIndividual Level, Interpersonal Level, Community Level, Education Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gary Ka-Ki ChungCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Mark RobinsonInstitute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia.
Michael MarmotCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jean WooCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many developed countries such as the UK and Australia, addressing socioeconomic inequalities in health is a priority in their policy agenda, with well-established practices and authorities to collect and link selected health and social indicators for long-term monitoring. Nonetheless, the monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in health in Hong Kong remains in a piecemeal manner. Also, the common international practice to monitor inequalities at area level appears to be unsuitable in Hong Kong due to its small, compact, and highly interconnected built environment that limits the variation of neighbourhood deprivation level. To enhance inequality monitoring in Hong Kong, we aim to draw reference and lesson from the UK and Australia to explore the feasible steps forward regarding collection of health indicators and contextually appropriate equity stratifiers with strong implication on policy actions, and discuss potential strategies to promote the public awareness and motivations for a more comprehensive inequality monitoring system.

Indexed as

AustraliaData collectionHealth inequalityHong KongMonitoringSocioeconomicUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID36879790
PMCPMC9985041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.