Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879785›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Provincial variations in catastrophic health expenditure and medical impoverishment in China: a nationwide population-based study.

Yusheng Jia, Min Hu, Hongqiao Fu, Winnie Yip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and validation of the healthcare access barrier scale (HABS).International journal for equity in health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yusheng JiaSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Min HuSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongqiao FuSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Winnie YipDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Financial protection, as a key dimension of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), has been under increasing attention in recent years. A series of studies have examined the nationwide extent of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and medical impoverishment (MI) in China. However, disparities in financial protection at the province level have rarely been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate provincial variations in financial protection as well as its inequality across provinces. Methods: Using data from the 2017 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), this study estimated the incidence and intensity of CHE and MI for 28 Chinese provinces. Ordinary least square (OLS) estimation, using robust standard errors, was used to explore the factors associated with financial protection at the province level. Moreover, this study examined the urban-rural differences in financial protection within each province, and calculated the concentration index of CHE and MI indicators for each province using household income per capita. Findings: The study revealed large provincial variations in financial protection within the nation. The nationwide CHE incidence was 11.0% (95% CI: 10.7%, 11.3%), ranging from 6.3% (95% CI: 5.0%, 7.6%) in Beijing to 16.0% (95% CI: 14.0%, 18.0%) in Heilongjiang; the national MI incidence was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.8%, 2.1%), ranging from 0.03% (95% CI: 0.00%, 0.06%) in Shanghai to 4.6% (95% CI: 3.3%, 5.9%) in Anhui province. We also found similar patterns for provincial variations in intensity of CHE and MI. Moreover, substantial provincial variations in income-related inequality and urban-rural gap existed across provinces. Eastern developed provinces in general had much lower inequality within them, compared with central and western provinces. Interpretation: Despite the great advances towards UHC in China, substantial provincial variations exist in financial protection across provinces. Policymakers should pay special attention to low-income households in central and western provinces. Provision of better financial protection for these vulnerable groups will be key to achieving UHC in China. Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 72074049) and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (2020PJC013).

Indexed as

Catastrophic health expenditureChinaFinancial protectionMedical impoverishmentSubnational variation

Identifiers

PMID36879785
PMCPMC9985024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.