Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879777›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Factors associated with the uptake of national essential public health service package for hypertension and type-2 diabetes management in China's primary health care system: a mixed-methods study.

Shangzhi Xiong, Wei Jiang, Ruilin Meng, Chi Hu, Hui Liao, Yongchen Wang, Chang Cai, Xinyi Zhang, Pengpeng Ye, Yanqiuzi Ma and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Physicians' Perspectives Regarding Informal Health Practitioners in Bangladesh.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shangzhi XiongThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Wei JiangNational Centre for Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Ruilin MengGuangdong Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Chi HuYichang City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang, China.
Hui LiaoWenchuan County Health Bureau, Wenchuan, China.
Yongchen WangDivision of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Chang CaiPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Xinyi ZhangSchool of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Pengpeng YeThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Yanqiuzi MaNational Centre for Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Tingzhuo LiuSchool of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Dandan PengGuangdong Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajuan YangYichang City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang, China.
Li GongWenchuan County Health Bureau, Wenchuan, China.
Qiujun WangDivision of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Limin MaoCentre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Maoyi TianThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Harbin Medical University · CNUNSW Sydney · AUGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSecond Hospital of Yichang · CNImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: China launched the primary health care (PHC) system oriented National Essential Public Health Service Package (NEPHSP) in 2009, to combat health challenges including the increasing burden from hypertension and type-2 diabetes (T2DM). In this study, the PHC system was assessed to understand factors influencing the uptake of the NEPHSP for hypertension and T2DM management. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in seven counties/districts from five provinces across the mainland of China. Data included a PHC facility level survey and interviews with policy makers, health administrators, PHC providers, and individuals with hypertension and/or T2DM. The facility survey used the World Health Organisation (WHO) service availability and readiness assessment questionnaire. Interviews were thematically analysed using the WHO health systems building blocks. Findings: A total of 518 facility surveys were collected with over 90% in rural settings (n = 474). Forty-eight in-depth individual interviews and 19 focus-group discussions were conducted across all sites. Triangulating the quantitative and qualitative data found that China's continuous political commitment to strengthening the PHC system led to improvements in workforce and infrastructure. Despite this, many barriers were identified, including insufficient and under-qualified PHC personnel, remaining gaps in medicines and equipment, fragmented health information systems, residents' low trust and utilization of PHC, challenges in coordinated and continuous care, and lack of cross-sectorial collaborations. Interpretation: The study findings provided recommendation for future PHC system strengthening, including improving the quality of NEPHSP delivery, facilitating resource-sharing across health facilities, establishing integrated care systems, and exploring mechanisms for better cross-sectorial engagement in health governance. Funding: The study is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Global Alliance for Chronic Disease funding (APP1169757).

Indexed as

DiabetesHypertensionMixed-methods studyNon-communicable diseasesPrimary health care system

Identifiers

PMID36879777
PMCPMC9985050
OpenAlexW4311441999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.