ArticleIranian endodontic journal2019
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of surface tensions and root-dentin surface contact angles of different endodontic irrigation solutions.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Can Heated Distilled Water Effectively Prevent Precipitate Formation between NaOCl and CHX?International journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Assessment of Dentinal Tubules Penetration by Hyben X Delivered into the Root Canal System as an Irrigant; AnIranian endodontic journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate dynamic viscosity, surface tension and dentin wettability of a newly introduced imidazolium-based silver nanoparticle solution (Im AgNP) in comparison with three common root canal irrigants. Methods and Materials: The irrigants were Im AgNPs at 5.7×10 Results: Dynamic viscosity of all irrigants decreased as the temperature increased. 17% EDTA was the most viscous solution in all examined temperatures ( Conclusion: Im AgNP irrigant has the potential to reach apical portions of root canals due to its lower viscosity compared to the other tested irrigants. However, it may not bring better penetration inside dentinal tubules because of its higher surface tension. Furthermore, Im AgNPs can influence physiochemical properties of dentin by decreasing its surface wettability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.