Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879581›Full record

ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology

Delayed Perforation of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Treated by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage.

Koichi Hamada, Yoshiki Shiwa, Akira Kurita, Yukitoshi Todate, Yoshinori Horikawa, Kae Techigawara, Masafumi Ishikawa, Takayuki Nagahashi, Yuki Takeda, Daizo Fukushima and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Koichi HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Yoshiki ShiwaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Akira KuritaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yukitoshi TodateDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Yoshinori HorikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Kae TechigawaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Masafumi IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Takayuki NagahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Yuki TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Daizo FukushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Noriyuki NishinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Hideo SakumaDepartment of Pathology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Michitaka HondaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Southern Tohoku General Hospital · JPFukushima Medical University · JPRakuwakai Otowa Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a case of a 70-year-old male with delayed perforation in the cecum treated by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage for a pelvic abscess. The lesion was a 50-mm laterally spreading tumor, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed. No perforation was detected during the operation, and en bloc resection was achieved. He had fever and abdominal pain on postoperative day (POD) 2. Computed tomography (CT) revealed the intra-abdominal free air, leading to a diagnosis of delayed perforation after ESD. Vital signs were stable, the perforation was considered minor, and endoscopic closure was attempted. The colonoscopy under fluoroscopy showed no perforation in the ulcer and no leakage of the contrast medium. He was managed conservatively with antibiotics and nothing per os. Symptoms improved; however, a follow-up CT on POD 13 revealed a 65-mm pelvic abscess, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage was successfully performed. The follow-up CT on POD 23 showed the reduction of abscess, and the drainage tubes were removed. Emergent surgical treatment is crucial in delayed perforation because it has a poor prognosis, and reports of conservative therapy for colonic ESD with delayed perforation are few. The present case was managed with antibiotics and EUS-guided drainage. Thus, EUS-guided drainage can be a treatment option for delayed perforation after colorectal ESD, if the abscess is localized.

Indexed as

Colorectal neoplasmsDrainageEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopic ultrasonographyPerforation

Identifiers

PMID36879581
PMCPMC9984940
OpenAlexW4323036408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.