Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879489›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

"It's all my fault": a qualitative study of how heterosexual couples experience living with vulvodynia.

Linn Myrtveit-Stensrud, Gro Killi Haugstad, Silje Endresen Rème, Sidsel Louise Schaller, Karen Synne Groven

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Women's Causal Beliefs About Their Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Male Responses to Female Partners with Genitopelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: A Systematic Review of Biopsychological Impacts and Coping Strategies.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
  10. Editorial: Pain and relationships.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Understanding and addressing female pelvic pain - a multifaceted challenge.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linn Myrtveit-StensrudDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-0390
Gro Killi HaugstadDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Silje Endresen RèmeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sidsel Louise SchallerDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karen Synne GrovenDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Norske Kvinners Sanitetsforening 40017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVulvodynia, a chronic genital pain disorder with a high lifetime prevalence among women, has a significant negative impact on both women and their partners. Although there is a growing body of literature on the experiences of women with vulvodynia, there has been little research on the condition's implications for partners and romantic relationships. The aim of this study is to explore how heterosexual couples experience living with vulvodynia. MATERIAL AND

methodsEight Norwegian women diagnosed with vulvodynia by gynecologists were recruited with their partners (couples aged 19-32 years). Data was collected via individual semi-structured interviews and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThree main themes were identified in the analysis: Mysterious disorder, Social exclusion and Sexual expectations. The results show that the couples struggle with understanding the pain, as well as navigating their social and sexual lives. We discuss these findings in light of a new theoretical model: the fear-avoidance-endurance model of vulvodynia.

conclusionsHeterosexual couples living with vulvodynia experience communication difficulties with partners, health professionals, and their social network. This sustains avoidance and endurance behavior, increasing pain and dysfunction over time and giving rise to feelings of powerlessness and loneliness. Social expectations regarding male and female sexuality also promote guilt and shame for both parties in couples affected by vulvodynia. Our results suggest that heterosexual couples living with vulvodynia, as well as health professionals treating them, should be helped to communicate more effectively in order to break vicious circles of maladaptive avoidance and endurance behavior.

Indexed as

Chronic PainVulvodyniaFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexual Partnerschronic painendurancefear-avoidanceheterosexual couplesqualitative studyvulvodynia

Identifiers

PMID36879489
PMCPMC10540927
OpenAlexW4323348760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.