ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2024
Clinical Accuracy of a Glucose Oxidase-Based Blood Glucose Test-Strip Across Extremes of Oxygen Partial Pressure.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Study of accuracy assessment of the Gmate LIFE blood glucose monitoring system].Problemy endokrinologii · 2026Article
- Electrochemical Glucose Sensor Based on Dual Redox Mediators.Biosensors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlucose oxidase (GOx)-based blood glucose monitors (BGMs) are influenced by the partial pressure of oxygen (Po
methodClinical accuracy data were collected as part of a BGM manufacturer's ongoing post-market surveillance program for a commercially available GOx-based BGM test-strip. The data set comprised 29 901 paired BGM-comparator readings and corresponding Po
resultsA linear regression-calculated bias range of 5.22% (+0.72% [low Po
conclusionsData from this large-scale clinical study, performed on unmanipulated fingertip capillary bloods from a diverse diabetes population, indicate Po
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.