SynthesisJournal of hematology & oncology2023
Treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2025 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- Pooled it
- Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in patients with symptoms of urinary tract infections: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment ofHaematologica · 2026Trial
- Trial
- A Phase 1b/2 Study of TP-0903 and Decitabine Targeting Mutant TP53 and/or Complex Karyotype in Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia ≥Age 60 Years.Cancer research communications · 2025Trial
- Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Magrolimab in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Phase Ib/II Study and Correlative Analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Current and future therapies for acute myeloblastic leukemia.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- TP53 deficiency in AML induces resistance to T-cell engagers through an immunosuppressive secretome.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients: An Updated Canadian Consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Controversies in the Management of AML in Older Patients: A Canadian Perspective.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Response to Comment on: "Clinical interrogation ofHaematologica · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of intensive chemotherapy in patients with TP53-mutated AML.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Synthetic lethality of decitabine plus ATR inhibition for TP53-mutated AML.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Integrating Genomic and Clinical Data in AML: Real-World Application of the Sanger Multistage Model.Genes · 2026Article
- Single-cell profiling reveals reprogrammed hierarchy and disrupted immune-stromal ecosystem in TP53-mutated AML.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Gene mutation in metabolism syndrome with hematologic tumor: A retrospective cohort study.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Observational
- Acute Non-promyelocytic Leukemia with Complex Karyotype and Novel t (15;17) (q21; p11.2)/B2M:Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Functional heterogeneity of TP53 mutants in venetoclax-resistant AML: mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTP53 mutations, which are present in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), are associated with treatment resistance and poor outcomes. First-line therapies for TP53-mutated (TP53m) AML consist of intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA), or venetoclax combined with HMA (VEN + HMA).
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with TP53m AML. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies were included that reported on complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall response rate (ORR) among patients with TP53m AML receiving first-line treatment with IC, HMA, or VEN + HMA.
resultsSearches of EMBASE and MEDLINE identified 3006 abstracts, and 17 publications describing 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates, and time-related outcomes were analyzed with the median of medians method. IC was associated with the greatest CR rate of 43%, and CR rates were 33% for VEN + HMA and 13% for HMA. Rates of CR/CRi were comparable for IC (46%) and VEN + HMA (49%) but were lower for HMA (13%). Median OS was uniformly poor across treatments: IC, 6.5 months; VEN + HMA, 6.2 months; and HMA, 6.1 months. For IC, the EFS estimate was 3.7 months; EFS was not reported for VEN + HMA or HMA. The ORR was 41% for IC, 65% for VEN + HMA, and 47% for HMA. DoR was 3.5 months for IC, 5.0 months for VEN + HMA, and was not reported for HMA.
conclusionsDespite improved responses seen with IC and VEN + HMA compared to HMA, survival was uniformly poor, and clinical benefits were limited across all treatments for patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53m AML, demonstrating a significant need for improved treatment for this difficult-to-treat population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.