Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879312›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2023

Understanding the corporate political activity of the ultra - processed food industry in East Asia: a Philippines case study.

Oliver Huse, Erica Reeve, Paul Zambrano, Colin Bell, Anna Peeters, Gary Sacks, Phillip Baker, Kathryn Backholer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oliver HuseGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. Oliver.huse@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9366-8012
Erica ReeveGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Paul ZambranoAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Manila, Philippines.
Colin BellGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Anna PeetersGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Phillip BakerFaculty of Health, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Kathryn BackholerGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence is mounting that the ultra - processed food industry seeks to influence food and nutrition policies in ways that support market growth and protect against regulatory threats, often at the expense of public health. However, few studies have explored how this occurs in lower - middle income countries. We aimed to explore if and how the ultra - processed food industry seeks to influence food- and nutrition - related policy processes in the Philippines, a lower - middle income country in East Asia.

methodsSemi - structured key informant interviews were conducted with ten representatives from the Philippines government and non - government organisations closely involved with nutrition policy making in the Philippines. Interview schedules and data analysis were guided by the policy dystopia model, which we used to identify the instrumental and discursive strategies used by corporate actors to influence policy outcomes.

resultsInformants were of the view that ultra - processed food companies in the Philippines sought to delay, prevent, water - down and circumvent implementation of globally recommended food and nutrition policies by engaging in a range of strategies. Discursive strategies included various tactics in which globally recommended policies were framed as being ineffective or highlighting potential unintended negative impacts. Instrumental strategies included: directly engaging with policymakers; promoting policies, such as industry - led codes and practices, as substitutes for mandatory regulations; presenting evidence and data that industry has generated themselves; and offering gifts and financial incentives to government individuals and agencies.

conclusionsIn the Philippines, the ultra - processed food industry engaged in overt activities designed to influence food and nutrition policy processes in their favour. A range of measures to minimise industry influence on policy processes should be introduced, to ensure that implemented food and nutrition policies align with best practice recommendations.

Indexed as

Food, ProcessedNutrition PolicyAsia, EasternHumansPhilippinesPoliticsCorporate political activityHealth policyNutritionPhilippinesUltra - processed foods

Identifiers

PMID36879312
PMCPMC9986662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.