Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879227›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

coda4microbiome: compositional data analysis for microbiome cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

M Luz Calle, Meritxell Pujolassos, Antoni Susin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Oral intake ofNutrients · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. mSphere · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Luz CalleBiosciences Department, Faculty of Sciences, Technology and Engineering, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Carrer de La Laura, 13, 08500, Vic, Spain. malu.calle@uvic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-415X
Meritxell PujolassosBiosciences Department, Faculty of Sciences, Technology and Engineering, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Carrer de La Laura, 13, 08500, Vic, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0313-3506
Antoni SusinMathematical Department, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-2784

Funding

Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation PID2019-104830RB-I00Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation PID2021-122136OB-C21Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation PID2021-123657OB-C33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the main challenges of microbiome analysis is its compositional nature that if ignored can lead to spurious results. Addressing the compositional structure of microbiome data is particularly critical in longitudinal studies where abundances measured at different times can correspond to different sub-compositions.

resultsWe developed coda4microbiome, a new R package for analyzing microbiome data within the Compositional Data Analysis (CoDA) framework in both, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The aim of coda4microbiome is prediction, more specifically, the method is designed to identify a model (microbial signature) containing the minimum number of features with the maximum predictive power. The algorithm relies on the analysis of log-ratios between pairs of components and variable selection is addressed through penalized regression on the "all-pairs log-ratio model", the model containing all possible pairwise log-ratios. For longitudinal data, the algorithm infers dynamic microbial signatures by performing penalized regression over the summary of the log-ratio trajectories (the area under these trajectories). In both, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, the inferred microbial signature is expressed as the (weighted) balance between two groups of taxa, those that contribute positively to the microbial signature and those that contribute negatively. The package provides several graphical representations that facilitate the interpretation of the analysis and the identified microbial signatures. We illustrate the new method with data from a Crohn's disease study (cross-sectional data) and on the developing microbiome of infants (longitudinal data).

conclusionscoda4microbiome is a new algorithm for identification of microbial signatures in both, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The algorithm is implemented as an R package that is available at CRAN ( https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coda4microbiome/ ) and is accompanied with a vignette with a detailed description of the functions. The website of the project contains several tutorials: https://malucalle.github.io/coda4microbiome/.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMicrobiotaCross-Sectional StudiesData AnalysisHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesCompositional data analysisLog-ratio analysisLongitudinal studiesMicrobial signaturesMicrobiome analysisPenalized regression

Identifiers

PMID36879227
PMCPMC9990256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.