Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879224›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Increasing demand for ophthalmic pathology: time trends in a laboratory with nationwide coverage.

Gustav Stålhammar, Emma Lardner, Marianne Georgsson, Stefan Seregard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gustav StålhammarSt. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. gustav.stalhammar@ki.se.
Emma LardnerSt. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marianne GeorgssonSt. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan SeregardSt. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Cancerfonden 20 0798 FkCarmen and Bertil Regnér's Foundation 2020-00062Karolinska Institutet 2021-01131Ögonfonden 2021-04-16Region Stockholm 20200356Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences ME2019-0036Stiftelsen Kronprinsessan Margaretas Arbetsnämnd för Synskadade 157Svenska Läkaresällskapet Cronqvists stiftelse, SLS 934014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the time trends in basic patient characteristics and the number of specimens received at a national referral center for ophthalmic pathology.

methodsData on patient sex, age at surgical resection and geographical location of the referring unit were obtained for all specimens received at the St. Erik Ophthalmic Pathology laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden, between January 1

resultsA total of 33 057 specimens had been received, of which 14 560 (44%) came from men and 18 477 (56%) from women (for 20 patients, the sex was not specified). The average annual percent change (AAPC) in the number specimens received was + 10.5%, whereas the Swedish population increased with 0.5% per year. Patients became older throughout the period, with an average yearly increase of patient age at surgery of 0.3 years (AAPC 0.2%). Overall, women were three years older than men at surgery (59.4 versus 56.4 years, P < 0.0001) The number of specimens increased with patient age from the first to the 8

conclusionsDuring six decades, the growth in number of specimens sent to our national referral center for ophthalmic pathology has greatly outpaced the growth of the population, indicating an increasing demand for subspecialized services. Throughout the period, patients have become older, and a higher number of specimens have been submitted from female patients.

Indexed as

EyeFaceFemaleHumansInfantMaleReferral and ConsultationSwedenEpidemiologyOcular pathologyOncologyOphthalmic pathologyPopulation statisticsTime trend

Identifiers

PMID36879224
PMCPMC9987064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.