Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879201›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2023

A realist evaluation of the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a digital music and movement intervention for older people living in care homes.

E F Ofosu, L De Nys, J Connelly, G C Ryde, A C Whittaker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05559203 (A Realist Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Digital Music and Movement Intervention for Older People Living in Care Homes), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05559203 nacompletednot on this map

A Realist Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Digital Music and Movement Intervention for Older People Living in Care Homes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of StirlingRan2021 to 2022Enrolled47ConditionsAged, Older Adults, Healthy Aging, AgingArmsdanceSing Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E F OfosuFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK4 9LA, Scotland, UK.
L De NysFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK4 9LA, Scotland, UK.
J ConnellyFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK4 9LA, Scotland, UK.
G C RydeSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
A C WhittakerFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK4 9LA, Scotland, UK. a.c.whittaker@stir.ac.uk.
University of Stirling · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow physical activity in care home residents brings about negative mental health consequences, such as higher levels of depression and loneliness. With advancements in communication technology, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the feasibility and effectiveness of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a digital Physical Activity (PA) resource in care homes deserve more research attention. A realist evaluation was used to uncover influencing factors of a feasibility study implementation to inform how a digital music and movement programme would work and under what circumstances this would be most effective.

methodsParticipants were 49 older adults (aged 65 years +) recruited across ten care homes in Scotland. Surveys were administered at baseline and post-intervention comprising psychometric questionnaires on multidimensional health markers validated in older adults with possible cognitive impairment. The intervention comprised 12 weeks of four prescribed digitally delivered movement (n = 3) and music-only (n = 1) sessions per week. An activity coordinator delivered these online resources in the care home. Post-intervention focus groups with staff and interviews with a sub-sample of participants were conducted to gain qualitative data on the acceptability of the intervention.

resultsThirty three care home residents started the intervention, but only 18 residents (84% female) completed both pre- and post-intervention assessments. Activity coordinators (AC) offered 57% of the prescribed sessions, with an average residents' adherence of 60%. Delivery of the intervention did not go as planned due to Covid restrictions in care homes and delivery challenges, including (1) motivation and engagement, (2) changes in cognitive impairment and disabilities of the participants, (3) death or hospitalisation of the participants and (4) limited staffing and technology resources to deliver the programme as intended. Despite this, group participation and encouragement of residents supported the delivery and acceptance of the intervention, with ACs and residents reporting improved mood, physical health, job satisfaction and social support. Improvements with large effect sizes were found for anxiety, depression, loneliness, perceived stress and sleep satisfaction, but no changes in fear of falling, domains of general health or appetite.

conclusionThis realist evaluation suggested that this digitally delivered movement and music intervention is feasible. From the findings, the initial programme theory was refined for future implementation of an RCT in other care homes but future research exploring how to tailor the intervention to those with cognitive impairment and/or lacking capacity to consent is needed.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05559203.

Indexed as

COVID-19MusicAccidental FallsAgedAnxietyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleActivity coordinatorsCare homesDigital physical activityFeasibilityRealist evaluationResidents

Identifiers

PMID36879201
PMCPMC9987360
OpenAlexW4323311642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.