Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879114›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2023

Vaccines as treatments for prostate cancer.

Ichwaku Rastogi, Anusha Muralidhar, Douglas G McNeel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Trojan Horse Strategy: How Biomimetic Nanomedicine Remodels the Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. [Bispecific antibodies in prostate cancer therapy].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ichwaku RastogiUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Anusha MuralidharUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-1266
Douglas G McNeelUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. dm3@medicine.wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1471-6723
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Prostate SPOREP50CA269011 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVID F. JARRARD, DOUGLAS G. MCNEEL · 2023 to 2026
$10.6M
Effective Anti-Tumor Vaccination - Targeting Checkpoint Regulation at the Time of T-cell ActivationR01CA219154 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCNEEL, DOUGLAS G. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA269011NCI NIH HHS R01 CA219154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death in men worldwide. For over 30 years, growing interest has focused on the development of vaccines as treatments for prostate cancer, with the goal of using vaccines to activate immune cells capable of targeting prostate cancer to either eradicate recurrent disease or at least delay disease progression. This interest has been prompted by the prevalence and long natural history of the disease and by the fact that the prostate is an expendable organ. Thus, an immune response elicited by vaccination might not need to target the tumour uniquely but could theoretically target any prostate tissue. To date, different vaccine approaches and targets for prostate cancer have been evaluated in clinical trials. Overall, five approaches have been assessed in randomized phase III trials and sipuleucel-T was approved as a treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, being the only vaccine approved to date by the FDA as a treatment for cancer. Most vaccine approaches showed safety and some evidence of immunological activity but had poor clinical activity when used as monotherapies. However, increased activity has been observed when these vaccines were used in combination with other immune-modulating therapies. This evidence suggests that, in the future, prostate cancer vaccines might be used to activate and expand tumour-specific T cells as part of combination approaches with agents that target tumour-associated immune mechanisms of resistance.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyMaleProstateCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36879114
PMCPMC9987387
OpenAlexW4323311065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.