ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Age of onset and factors affecting treatment responses in ocular myasthenia gravis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A controlled clinical study on efficacy and safety of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for treating ocular myasthenia gravis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Identification of Ocular and Systemic Predictors and Development of a Prediction Model in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Treatment in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis Based on Minimal Manifestation: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- The Incidence of Myasthenia Gravis in the Province of Ferrara, Italy, in the Period of 2008-2022: An Update on a 40-Year Observation and the Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOcular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is an autoimmune disease which causes ptosis, diplopia, or both. It can be categorized as early or late onset, with differing presenting characteristics and prognoses. Currently, there is limited information available to compare characteristics and outcomes in onset groups in Thailand.
objectiveTo describe and compare baseline characteristics and outcomes in OMG patients classified by onset groups and to investigate the factors associated with the disease, especially in terms of treatment responses classified according to the MGFA Post-Intervention Status (MGFA-PIS).
methodsOMG patients diagnosed between January 2014 and March 2021 at Rajavithi Hospital, Thailand, were categorized into 2 groups based on age of onset, and baseline characteristics were analyzed and compared. The treatment responses of each group in terms of time to achievement of minimal manifestations (MM) were analyzed.
resultsEighty-one patients (38 with early and 43 with late onset) were included, and the mean (SD) follow-up time was 35.85 months (17.25). There was no significant difference between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. A low dose of pyridostigmine was more commonly used in the early-onset group (p = 0.01), while the mean dose of corticosteroids was significantly lower in the late-onset patients (p < 0.001). We found that seropositivity of acetylcholine receptor antibody decreased the odds ratio of achievement of MM (OR 0.185, 95% CI 0.043-0.789, p = 0.023) and receiving a high dose of pyridostigmine (≥ 120 mg/day) increased the odds ratio of achieving it (OR 8.296, 95% CI 2.136-32.226, p = 0.002).
conclusionsA higher dose of pyridostigmine may be necessary for achievement of favorable treatment response. AChRAb seropositivity is a predictor for unfavorable treatment response in Thai populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.