Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879087›Full record

Trial reportLung2023

The Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant in a Phase 3b Trial of Patients with Recent-Onset Chronic Cough.

Lorcan McGarvey, Mandel Sher, Yury Grigorievich Shvarts, Susan Lu, Wen-Chi Wu, Ping Xu, Jonathan Schelfhout, Carmen La Rosa, Allison Martin Nguyen, Paul A Reyfman and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04193202 (A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant in Adult Participants With Recent Onset Chronic Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04193202 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant in Adult Participants With Recent Onset Chronic Cough

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2020 to 2021Enrolled419ConditionsChronic CoughArmsGefapixant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorcan McGarveyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Science, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland. l.mcgarvey@qub.ac.uk.
Mandel SherSher Allergy Specialists, LLC, Largo, FL, USA.
Yury Grigorievich ShvartsSaratov Medical University, Saratov, Russia.
Susan LuMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Wen-Chi WuMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Ping XuMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Jonathan SchelfhoutMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Carmen La RosaMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Allison Martin NguyenMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Paul A ReyfmanMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Amna Sadaf AfzalMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USSaratov State Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in participants with recent-onset (≤ 12 months) refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC).

methodsParticipants (≥ 18 years of age; ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm cough severity visual analog scale [VAS] at screening and randomization) with chronic cough for < 12 months were enrolled in this phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study (NCT04193202). Participants were randomized 1:1 to gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo for 12 weeks with a 2-week follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline at Week 12 in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) total score. Adverse events were monitored and evaluated.

resultsThere were 415 participants randomized and treated (mean age 52.5 years; median [range] duration 7.5 [1-12] months): 209 received placebo and 206 received gefapixant 45 mg BID. A statistically significant treatment difference of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.44; p = 0.034) for gefapixant vs. placebo was observed for change from baseline in LCQ total score at Week 12. The most common AE was dysgeusia (32% gefapixant vs. 3% placebo participants); serious AEs were rare (1.5% gefapixant vs. 1.9% placebo participants).

conclusionGefapixant 45 mg BID demonstrated significantly greater improvement in cough-specific health status from baseline compared to placebo, in participants with recent-onset chronic cough. The most common AEs were related to taste and serious AEs were rare.

Indexed as

CoughPyrimidinesBenzenesulfonamidesChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeBenzenesulfonamidesGefapixantPyrimidinesSulfonamidesAntitussivesChronic coughP2X3 receptor antagonistsRefractory chronic coughUnexplained chronic cough

Identifiers

PMID36879087
PMCPMC10115701
OpenAlexW4323307074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.