Trial reportLung2023
The Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant in a Phase 3b Trial of Patients with Recent-Onset Chronic Cough.
Trial report in Lung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04193202 (A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant in Adult Participants With Recent Onset Chronic Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant in Adult Participants With Recent Onset Chronic Cough
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Psychometric validation of the severity of chronic cough diary, leicester cough questionnaire, and a cough severity visual analogue scale in patients with refractory chronic cough.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Trial
- Physiological mechanisms and therapeutic targets in chronic cough.Physiological reports · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors for refractory and untreated chronic cough in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Comparative Analysis of Classic and Novel Antitussives on Cough Suppression in Guinea Pigs.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Real-world usage and response to gefapixant in refractory chronic cough.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Mycobacterial Phenolic Glycolipid Triggers ATP-Mediated Neuronal P2X3 Signaling and Cough.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Touching a Nerve: Neuroimmune Interactions in Asthma.Immunological reviews · 2025Review
- Oral Capsaicin as Treatment for Unexplained Chronic Cough and Airway Symptoms.CHEST pulmonary · 2024Article
- Article
- Drugs Targeting Cough Receptors: New Therapeutic Options in Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough.Drugs · 2024Review
- LUNG Year in Review: 2023.Lung · 2024Article
- Review
- EU COST Action CA21130 PRESTO 'P2X receptors as therapeutic targets' inaugural meeting report.Purinergic signalling · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in participants with recent-onset (≤ 12 months) refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC).
methodsParticipants (≥ 18 years of age; ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm cough severity visual analog scale [VAS] at screening and randomization) with chronic cough for < 12 months were enrolled in this phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study (NCT04193202). Participants were randomized 1:1 to gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo for 12 weeks with a 2-week follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline at Week 12 in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) total score. Adverse events were monitored and evaluated.
resultsThere were 415 participants randomized and treated (mean age 52.5 years; median [range] duration 7.5 [1-12] months): 209 received placebo and 206 received gefapixant 45 mg BID. A statistically significant treatment difference of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.44; p = 0.034) for gefapixant vs. placebo was observed for change from baseline in LCQ total score at Week 12. The most common AE was dysgeusia (32% gefapixant vs. 3% placebo participants); serious AEs were rare (1.5% gefapixant vs. 1.9% placebo participants).
conclusionGefapixant 45 mg BID demonstrated significantly greater improvement in cough-specific health status from baseline compared to placebo, in participants with recent-onset chronic cough. The most common AEs were related to taste and serious AEs were rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.