Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879063›Full record

ReviewNeuroradiology2023

Unusual neuroimaging findings in spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

Andrew L Callen, William P Dillon, Vinil N Shah

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew L CallenNeuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. andrew.callen@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-7767
William P DillonDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Vinil N ShahDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe most common neuroimaging manifestations of patients suffering from spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) include subdural fluid collections, enhancement of the pachymeninges, engorgement of venous structures, pituitary hyperemia, sagging of the brainstem, and cerebellar hemosiderosis. However, infrequently patients may present with separate neuroradiological findings which could be easily mistaken for other pathology.

methodsWe describe patients who presented with unique neuroimaging findings who were eventually found to have a spinal CSF leak or venous fistula. Relevant clinical history and neuroradiology findings are presented, and a relevant review of the literature is provided.

resultsWe present six patients with a proven CSF leak or fistula who presented with dural venous sinus thrombosis, compressive ischemic injury, spinal hemosiderosis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, pial vascular engorgement, calvarial hyperostosis, and spinal dural calcifications.

conclusionRadiologists should be familiar with atypical neuroimaging manifestations of SIH in order to avoid misdiagnosis and guide the clinical trajectory of the patient towards accurate diagnosis and eventual cure.

Indexed as

FistulaHemosiderosisHyperemiaIntracranial HypotensionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingCSF leakCSF venous fistulaSpontaneous intracranial hypotension

Identifiers

PMID36879063
OpenAlexW4323321975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.