ArticleNature human behaviour2023
Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spotting false news and doubting true news: a systematic review and meta-analysis of news judgements.Nature human behaviour · 2025Pooled it
- Insights from climate psychology for misinformation research.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Cognitive traits modulate the effects of images and familiarity on judgments of news accuracy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Understanding the impact of misinformation on adolescents.Nature human behaviour · 2026Review
- Speech Repression and Threat Narratives in Politics: Social Goals and Cognitive Foundations.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Review
- Motivations to connect with like-minded audiences increase partisan sharing on social media.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Article
- Political polarization and health.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Promoting civil discourse on social media using nudges: A tournament of seven interventions.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Community notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- The consequences of misinformation concern on media consumption.Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review · 2024Article
- Who shares fake news on social media? Evidence from vaccines and infertility claims in sub-Saharan Africa.PloS one · 2024Article
- Understanding belief in political statements using a model-driven experimental approach: a registered report.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Incentivizing free riders improves collective intelligence in social dilemmas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Tokenization of social media engagements increases the sharing of false (and other) news but penalization moderates it.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The attitudinal space framework: Embracing the multidimensionality of attitudinal diversity.iScience · 2023Article
- The intentions of information sources can affect what information people think qualifies as true.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Using psychological science to understand and fight health misinformation: An APA consensus statement.The American psychologistReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extent to which belief in (mis)information reflects lack of knowledge versus a lack of motivation to be accurate is unclear. Here, across four experiments (n = 3,364), we motivated US participants to be accurate by providing financial incentives for correct responses about the veracity of true and false political news headlines. Financial incentives improved accuracy and reduced partisan bias in judgements of headlines by about 30%, primarily by increasing the perceived accuracy of true news from the opposing party (d = 0.47). Incentivizing people to identify news that would be liked by their political allies, however, decreased accuracy. Replicating prior work, conservatives were less accurate at discerning true from false headlines than liberals, yet incentives closed the gap in accuracy between conservatives and liberals by 52%. A non-financial accuracy motivation intervention was also effective, suggesting that motivation-based interventions are scalable. Altogether, these results suggest that a substantial portion of people's judgements of the accuracy of news reflects motivational factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.