Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879004›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2023

Fostering the Next Generation of Researchers: a Sustainable Mentoring Program for Early Career Toxicologists in Scientific Abstract Review.

Mark B Mycyk, Christine M Murphy, Michael Chary, Peter R Chai, Adrienne Dunavin, Alison Meyn, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Getting the Most Out of Your Meeting Abstract: An Editor's Perspective.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark B MycykDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cook County Health, 1950 West Polk, 7thFloor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. mmycyk@cookcountyhhs.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8935-9962
Christine M MurphyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Michael CharyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Peter R ChaiDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Adrienne DunavinAmerican College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Alison MeynAmerican College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Maryann Mazer-AmirshahiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital, 110 Irving St NW, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presentation of abstracts at scientific meetings is an important step in the dissemination of scientific discovery. Most scientific meetings recruit volunteer experts to evaluate and score submitted abstracts to determine which ones qualify for presentation. Reviewing an abstract is an important service to one's specialty, but there is typically no formal training or required instruction during medical toxicology fellowship on scientific abstract scoring. In order to provide structured training in abstract review, the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) Research Committee launched the Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM) Abstract Review Mentor program in 2021. The goals of this program were to train fellows how to score scientific abstracts and provide them with new mentor connections to toxicologists outside of their training program. After evaluating 3 years of data from participating fellows-in-training and faculty mentors, we conclude that ACMT's Abstract Review Mentor program was successful in training future reviewers and fostering external mentorship relationships. All participants reported their experience in this program will change how they submit future abstracts to scientific meetings, help their future service as an abstract reviewer, and motivate their involvement in other specialty-related research activities. Implementing an abstract review training program is sustainable and a vital strategy for enhancing the dissemination of scientific discovery and training the next generation of medical toxicology researchers.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMentoringHealth PersonnelHumansMentorsResearch PersonnelUnited StatesAbstractPeer reviewScientific meeting

Identifiers

PMID36879004
PMCPMC10050293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.