Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36878906›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2023

Integrated analysis of next generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) and PET scan in transplant eligible myeloma patients.

Rodrigo Fonseca, Mariano Arribas, Julia E Wiedmeier-Nutor, Yael N Kusne, Miguel González Vélez, Heidi E Kosiorek, Richard Duke J Butterfield, Ilan R Kirsch, Joseph R Mikhael, A Keith Stewart and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. EANM guidelines on the use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo FonsecaDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7130-0340
Mariano ArribasDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-7098
Julia E Wiedmeier-NutorDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Yael N KusneDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Miguel González VélezDignity Health Cancer Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Heidi E KosiorekDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Richard Duke J ButterfieldDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Ilan R KirschTranslational Medicine, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph R MikhaelTranslational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-2864
A Keith StewartPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Craig ReederDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-0669
Jeremy LarsenDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
P Leif BergsagelDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-7388
Rafael FonsecaDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. fonseca.rafael@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-3769
Mayo Clinic Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USAdaptive Biotechnologies (United States) · USDignity Health · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Rafael Fonseca · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assays allow response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and negativity is associated with improved survival outcomes. The role of highly sensitive next generation sequencing (NGS) MRD in combination with functional imaging remains to be validated. We performed a retrospective analysis on MM patients who underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients were evaluated at day 100 post-ASCT with NGS-MRD and positron emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients with ≥ 2 MRD measurements were included in a secondary analysis for sequential measurements. 186 patients were included. At day 100, 45 (24.2%) patients achieved MRD negativity at a sensitivity threshold of 10

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36878906
PMCPMC9988896
OpenAlexW4323316666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.